logoalt Hacker News

Groxxtoday at 12:43 AM3 repliesview on HN

>* The length() SQL function only counts characters up to and excluding the first NUL.*

>The quote() SQL function only shows characters up to and excluding the first NUL.

>The .dump command in the CLI omits the first NUL character and all subsequent text in the SQL output that it generates. In fact, the CLI omits everything past the first NUL character in all contexts.

That's just all kinds of "oh no", wow.

I mean, I can't come up with a better strategy, but... oof. C-style strings being a thing at all really hurts.


Replies

ventanatoday at 2:37 AM

> C-style strings being a thing at all really hurts.

Well, C strings exist and are probably here to stay.

I believe Pascal strings, where the length is stored in the 0th character, were much worse (also, obligatory reference to Joel Spolsky's “Back to Basics” and “fucked strings” [1]).

Looks like we only got enough memory to spare to allow arbitrary length strings with arbitrary characters – that is, being able to use 2 or 4 bytes for the length of every string – in 1990s or so, when C++ strings and similar types became popular.

[1]: https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2001/12/11/back-to-basics/

show 1 reply
inigyoutoday at 2:13 AM

The better strategy is that it should just work, isn't it?

Scaevolustoday at 12:50 AM

It's not really a big problem. You should be storing arbitrary binary strings as blobs (and length() works properly with them), but the underlying encoding is nearly identical: https://www.sqlite.org/fileformat.html#record_format

show 2 replies