At what point would one say that the LLM critics were wrong in their load-bearing (yes I used it) claims?
If the critique itself turns out to be wrong. Using LLMs does not equal endorsement nor does it make valid points to critizise disappear. "using LLMs" has no clear definition and can still be in line with the critique.
If you have no critiques about a piece of technology in an area of technology that has existed for less than 10 years I think that speaks for itself.
The desire to categorize people as right or wrong should be resisted. It's tangential, and distracts by feeding the tribalism part of the brain instead of considering individual things that are explicitly stated.