Battery packs: Let's talk about crates, baby

The hobbyist device maker in me took waaay to long to be certain that this is NOT about physical batteries...

(was already confident, then there's suddenly a screenshot mentioning display components)

For those struggling for context like me: this is about the Rust programming language.

> Battery packs are meant to address one of the most common things I hear from new Rust adopters. Everyone loves the wealth of high-quality crates available on crates.io. And everyone hates having to spend a bunch of time researching and comparing alternatives.

> [...]

> One of the key ideas from battery packs is that anybody can publish one.

So now we get to research and compare alternative battery packs? I guess it could help if there's fewer of them, but I don't see why that would be.

Go ecosystems seems to choose quality over quantity (fewer higher-quality libraries) over Rust.

What seems to be causing this?

Off we go comparing battery packs.

Seriously though, I wish the dual futures, streams types to be consolidated first than building anything on top of the situation.