alt Hacker NewsGo is not a better C, in the sense that you cannot write an OS with it. Runtime, GC, etc.
But Go is a better language for many programs that were often written in C: network servers, CLI utilities, TUI utilities, etc.
Replies
yvdriess • today at 7:23 AM
The larger runtime makes bootstrapping go for unsupported architectures more laborious than C, but it's not a hard blocker. The function call overhead for inline assembly feels like more of an issue doing close to hw programming. It can be avoided for the runtime, but user go code can't escape it afaik.
Plenty of OSes, since Xerox PARC days have been written in GC systems languages.
Interlisp-D, Smalltalk, Cedar, Topaz, Oberon, Active Oberon, Singularity, Midori, Ironclad
Go's runtime is written in Go.
The whole compiler toolchain, GC, compiler, linker, Assembler, is written in Go.
There are Go compilers for bare metal, no OS needed, like TinyGo, the runtime, written in Go is the OS.
I love the "you cannot write an OS in a GC language" discourse.
It isn't only a mainstream thing because everyone only cares about UNIX clones.