logoalt Hacker News

quantummagictoday at 12:29 PM4 repliesview on HN

Pragmatically speaking, a half-assed answer now, is often better than a perfect answer tomorrow.


Replies

HPsquaredtoday at 12:40 PM

Something like the time value of money. But on the other hand, a bad answer can have negative value. Although "wrong and early" is better than "wrong and late".

show 2 replies
derektanktoday at 12:37 PM

Yeah, we live finite lives. Time is the one thing the vast majority of us aren’t getting more of. Of course speed is a priority. This isn’t a “capital” thing, it’s a fundamental part of the human experience.

show 3 replies
defendtoday at 12:38 PM

Depends what the cost of failure is.

If you're designing powerpoints or entertainment software; perhaps that's true. In the worst case you'll be embarrassed for producing AI slop or lose some revenue.

If your tool has the power to seriously harm or inconvenience people if built wrong, then it's just investor-fuelled myopia.

stingraycharlestoday at 2:02 PM

Yes, but a grand prize result being awarded to an AI slop submission is not it. It deteriorates the legitimacy of the whole contest if all that matters is convincing an AI rather than critical reviewers.