logoalt Hacker News

greekrich92today at 12:39 AM3 repliesview on HN

The subway should be free, and continuous fare hikes when you're already double paying with your eyes because of all the advertising they shove in front of you is more incentive to turnstile jump. Overpaid do-nothing senior adminstrators and lawmakers who are in the pocket of privatization are the problem, not that 17 year old.


Replies

pclowestoday at 12:47 AM

Enforcing fares massively decreases vandalism, and antisocial behavior on public transportation.

If you don’t have public transportation that I feel safe having a 10-year-old ride on unaccompanied by an adult then you do not have public transportation. You have a very expensive drug addict shelter on wheels/rails.

show 5 replies
dublinbentoday at 3:04 AM

Public transit should be worth the (inexpensive) cost of a ticket. The money used to make fares free should instead be spent on improving the quality of service. Better service attracts more riders, bringing in more ticket revenue, enabling further service improvements, and so on. It produces a positive flywheel effect that benefits current passengers, new passengers, and even drivers!

Free transit is a downward cycle, where increased ridership just increases costs, creating a negative flywheel.

show 1 reply
xyzelementtoday at 12:57 AM

Fares cover 40 per cent of the subway operating budget. It seems necessary revenue.

The 17 year old dodging fares becomes the 34 year old doing the same.

The percentage of fare dodgers who aren't pieces of shit in other parts of their life is zero.