logoalt Hacker News

hodgehog11yesterday at 9:16 AM12 repliesview on HN

The "second only to Fable 5" comment is pretty telling here. I remember early on when a lot of naysayers were saying that Fable was barely an improvement on Opus. Like it or not, Anthropic have a genuine moat right now with that model, provided they continue to allow people to use it. It will be genuinely exciting when an open model is able to beat it.


Replies

InsideOutSantayesterday at 9:33 AM

I wouldn't call it a moat, but I would call it a noticeably better model. Subjectively, for my own work, I would rate the top models Fable > K3 > Sol.

But it's not like Fable is so substantially better than the other two that I would be seriously impacted if I didn't have access to it anymore. All three are amazing models, and of the three, Fable is the only one that regularly triggers refusals.

show 2 replies
neevansyesterday at 9:19 AM

tbh even if its better model due to lot of restrictions its not that useful than opus.

show 2 replies
ferrouswheelyesterday at 9:33 AM

I dunno, I find Fable slops alot. Sol is my workhorse. Fable can be creative but isn't very good at doing work reliably (or without endlessly burning tokens).

vitalyan8184yesterday at 3:47 PM

their "genuine moat" is that mythos is the only super heavyweight model right now. it's always been possible to train a 10T model and get 10% more performance over a 1T model.

had mythos been just Opus 5, with the same size and price as the previous opuses, then yeah, that would be a tie-breaker. but it's not.

XCSmeyesterday at 10:48 AM

I am not even sure if Fable is as smart as they say, I can't get it to answer almost any question, it always refuses for "cyber-security" concerns...

recklessyesterday at 9:30 AM

5.6-sol would be a better comparison given it's general availability and usage allowances

show 2 replies
epolanskitoday at 9:44 AM

> Like it or not, Anthropic have a genuine moat

I don't think yours and my definition of moat is the same, when I can switch from Fable to competing models and have similar results.

scotty79yesterday at 11:42 AM

> saying that Fable was barely an improvement on Opus. Like it or not, Anthropic have a genuine moat right now with that model,

What's more interesting is that Anthropic moat shrunk to just that model. There's zero reason to use any other model from Anthropic right now. And once they take Fable off subscription there will be zero reason to have Anthropic subscription.

Havocyesterday at 11:43 PM

More like a puddle than a moat

dgellowyesterday at 9:50 AM

That’s not a moat though

nprateemyesterday at 10:30 PM

Fable is still as dumb as a post. I ask it simple questions and it routinely gets things backwards, prioritises things that should be subordinate to others, etc.

An example: It just suggested that I shouldn't raise the price of my saas because it'd complicate the arithmetic if I did 0 -> $100k YT channel instead of sticking to $20 p/m.

It's just a complete moron, like all of them.

matheusmoreirayesterday at 5:27 PM

What's the point of Fable if we can't use it? I get to prompt it like 5 times on my subscription before it gets cut off, and even then I'm constantly fighting the insufferable safety classifier.

I'll switch to OpenAI soon because of this. I also can't wait for the day it becomes feasible to run these awesome open weight models on my own hardware.