logoalt Hacker News

wat10000last Sunday at 6:55 PM2 repliesview on HN

The opposite is actually true in reality. More people can afford X than ever before, for nearly any X that doesn’t involve directly paying for someone else’s labor.


Replies

Joker_vDlast Sunday at 7:43 PM

Depends on the overarching economical policies. During the British rule, the Indian textile weavers went out of manufacturing business and had to switch to sustenance farming, and then perish during one of the many famines. And the Parliament legally forbade the public relief efforts, such as fundraisers to buy and send corn to the affected regions, explicitly citing the concerns that such efforts would skew the market forces and unbalance the trade.

show 1 reply
inigyoulast Sunday at 7:35 PM

What doesn't involve paying for someone else's labor? You mean things that are pure profit?

show 1 reply