I think they meant EPIC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explicitly_parallel_instructio..., not EPYC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epyc.
Indeed, my point was not all chips do well with Desktop application loads.
People were bad at handling parallelism with ia64, and still have problems today on better amd platforms with less janky compilers.
The fact an $800 chip still can beat a $14000 chip at some tasks probably should tell people something about concurrency scaling overhead. =3
Indeed, my point was not all chips do well with Desktop application loads.
People were bad at handling parallelism with ia64, and still have problems today on better amd platforms with less janky compilers.
The fact an $800 chip still can beat a $14000 chip at some tasks probably should tell people something about concurrency scaling overhead. =3