logoalt Hacker News

krackersyesterday at 6:37 AM1 replyview on HN

>Wasn't it proven true in general for n=2

Assuming you mean C^2 -> C^2, Do you have a link? If so it would be good to add to the wikipedia page. Also I'm not sure, but does the fact that there's a disproof for n=3 imply that it's false in all n>=3, or could there be higher dimensions where it still holds (I'd guess not since you could probably trivially "embed" this in higher dimensions in some way)


Replies

oliculipoliculayesterday at 6:58 AM

Paper linked above?

Edit my bad. I was more familiar with Dixmier and doing the translation I assumed A1 -> n=2. A2 is open ofc. Maybe to fall in 2031