logoalt Hacker News

janandonlyyesterday at 8:57 AM5 repliesview on HN

We should revive the micro payments feature that where built into very early browsers.

It didn’t catch on back then. But time are changing.


Replies

LukaDyesterday at 9:32 AM

> We should revive the micro payments feature that where built into very early browsers.

I don't think this was ever a thing. I know there's HTTP 402 and before 2000 there were some standards around payment being pursued but AFAIK nothing ever made it into browsers. Or am I missing something?

Itoldmyselfsoyesterday at 10:54 AM

Paywalling with extremely easy, one-click payment of very small amount might work. Paywalling does still incentivize things like misleading, sensationalized click-bait titles, but that's pretty much the norm everywhere.

Alternatively, if there was a subscription that covered a massive amount of blogs/news bundled into one low-cost subscription, that might also work. What I heavily doubt is if donation-based micropayments will ever find enough users to remain profitable.

show 2 replies
Kyeyesterday at 9:28 AM

I don't remember that, though I only started with early Netscape. Do you have more detail?

show 2 replies
shawnwallyesterday at 1:23 PM

I believe that was an intent/goal of BAT in Brave.

show 1 reply
carlosjobimyesterday at 12:31 PM

It has never worked and will never work. What has been proven to work is syndication, ie putting a giant amount of content behind a single paywall. Like Spotify, Netflix, Cable TV, other streamers do. Text publishers could easily do that if they wanted to. But it needs to be extremely broad, and not decided by ideological leanings or snobbery and such.

show 1 reply