> they get inundated with kooky proofs from amateurs
Source?
The citation needed is for the other part, which claims a mathematician got an amateur proof which was correct.
Nobody is reading unsolicited proofs. They are like spam.
Source: personal friend of a “crank”.
https://www.ufv.ca/media/faculty/gregschlitt/information/Wha...
The citation needed is for the other part, which claims a mathematician got an amateur proof which was correct.
Nobody is reading unsolicited proofs. They are like spam.
Source: personal friend of a “crank”.