logoalt Hacker News

ddoolinyesterday at 2:01 PM3 repliesview on HN

I wonder why the say "appears to have had," is that an assumption or was it stated somewhere? Without an offline backup, it would indeed be a very serious problem, more than it already is.


Replies

n4r9yesterday at 2:04 PM

My reading is: "The agency would surely be panicking more than this if they didn't have an offline backup".

show 1 reply
embedding-shapeyesterday at 2:04 PM

I think the "offline" part is what is that "appears" to be, clearly they have backups somewhere, but maybe the attacker just missed to wipe some other "online" location.

sixothreeyesterday at 3:42 PM

I interpreted this as a vagueness related to the reporting accuracy, not the existence of a backup.