logoalt Hacker News

basiswordyesterday at 5:10 PM9 repliesview on HN

The only friction here is 'you're not allowed to do that' - which doesn't typically work on teenagers. We had the same rules for dumbbphones and iPod's 20 years ago and it didn't work then.


Replies

Rebelgeckoyesterday at 6:32 PM

Fwiw when I was in school kids would definitely check their phones from time to time or send an occasional surreptitious text. But it wasn't as pervasive as it is today- I was pretty shocked to see even at the elementary school level how much class time kids spend on their personal devices

ameliusyesterday at 6:18 PM

> which doesn't typically work on teenagers

Depends. You have "good kids" and "bad kids".

If this law helps the good kids, then that's at least a win.

Jtsummersyesterday at 5:18 PM

In many US schools, they'd take those things away (and return them at end of day, typically) 20-30 years ago. But it helps when it's policy, if it's not a policy then the teacher has no backing from the school.

bilekasyesterday at 5:18 PM

It definitely reduced usesge though. I was the same age in teens with dumb phones and they were only banned in class. Either way, it's better to have the restrictions in this case than a free for all because teenagers will push limits constantly. I don't see a downside to this.

zdragnaryesterday at 6:25 PM

It absolutely worked in my school a little over 20 years ago. Teachers and staff always took away disallowed devices and that set the tone quite well.

throw1234567891yesterday at 5:20 PM

If it’s legally grounded you get more options.

oblioyesterday at 5:12 PM

I've talked to parents of kids where they banned smartphones and the difference is palpable. And good.

dbbkyesterday at 6:37 PM

Eh? It did work. You'd get it confiscated off you.