Aren't rationalists supposed to be objective and motivate their claims, rather than belittling any critic with unsubstantiated statements?
> This is a textbook study of motivated reasoning
What would be his motive, why would he have preconceptions about you?
Could it be that it's your messages here that are motivated, and with scarce reasoning?
>What would be his motive
A libertarian socialist podcaster tries to discuss an online culture that is adjacent to Silicon Valley tech scene. He then proceeds to take movement’s worst manifestations as its essence. One would have to be naive to miss the source of his bias.