logoalt Hacker News

JumpCrisscrosstoday at 12:39 AM2 repliesview on HN

> plenty of evidence of things like inner misalignment

This is indistuishable–in harm potential–from bugs. If we're just calling buggy AI mis-aligned, sure, alignment is an issue of a totally ordinary kind. If we're going to treat aligment as a novel issue requiring novel law and policy and procedure, it needs to be more than just bugs.

> you, and a large number of other people just wholesale throw out anything that isn't full speed ahead do whatever you want

I think we should have some AI regulation. I'm just not convinced alignment is the reason we need it right now, and I don't think anyone has rolled out any regulation I think makes a lot of sense. (Beyond general rules for social-media liability, e.g. if you cause a kid to kill themselves, you get in trouble.)

> Are they making a large mess of things like increased rate of cyber attacks and fraud. You damn well better believe it

Totallly agree. And the current inside-circle-outside-circle approach is pro-incumbency, pro-grift, anti-entrepreneurial B.S.


Replies

pixl97today at 2:40 AM

Saying a behavior is a bug is a very convenient semantic game in which there is nothing the AI can do maliciously. "I am sorry your family is dead, my bad" goes even worse for you in court when you release a model that showed these behaviors in testing.

I honestly believe you have a misunderstanding of what alignment is in neural networks that this that big of debate.

show 1 reply
amazingmantoday at 2:08 AM

In your model of this domain, jailbreaking a model does not count as an alignment problem. I submit that you're mostly playing a semantic game that hand waves away the very real and obvious risk that AI presents.

show 1 reply