> uses a specific, objectively nonsensical critique of LLMs (the idea that an algorithm using matrix operations as a primitive cannot emulate "true" intelligence)
> receives pushback on the specific, objectively nonsensical critique
> "oh so you're saying that LLM computation and human cognition are equivalent? they're glorified calculators that disprove the Jacobian conjecture!!!"
>the idea that an algorithm using matrix operations as a primitive cannot emulate "true" intelligence
I did not say that. Not even close.
In the words of Claude: I’ll end the conversation here. <end_conversation>