This came up the other day, can someone help explain this to me? I am not quite sharp enough to understand it. Context:
Based on your comments I think you do understand it but are taking it too seriously / too literally.
Consider the title: Scott Alexander and others have written more clear, philosophically robust versions of a similar argument ("you shouldn't trade your agency for good outcomes").
But that's not the point here. This is the artsy version that's supposed to make you feel the argument.
Seems like a fairly direct parable against AI, suggesting that even if it's right it's better to think for yourself.