alt Hacker NewsIts even dumber when you consider AI model output was not considered copyrighted or eligible for copyright to begin with, as far as I know. How exactly would this even be "theft"?
Replies
glaslong • today at 4:58 PM
I can't imagine Moonshot have found a way to completely bypass the subscription or api billing either. So those model outputs have been paid for! No theft of any kind!
At most they'd be getting more out of distributed use of subsidized plans and API than the ToS would prefer.
rubyfan • today at 9:15 PM
It’s theft because a lot of rich people have money on the line.
cyanydeez • today at 5:06 PM
steal from the rich -> theft
steal from the poor -> capitalism
➕ show 1 reply
Plus on top of that it's been ruled that training on copyrighted material is allowed because it's transformative. As a result even if the model output is copyrighted training on it would be as allowed as training on books.