logoalt Hacker News

rogerrogerrtoday at 4:09 PM4 repliesview on HN

I’m out of the loop on this, not trying to ignite a holy war, but what’s the gist of the anti-systemd stance?


Replies

peteetoday at 8:24 PM

Imho its not necessary for the average user, adding too much complexity.

For example, I tried to config gpsd to use another port, nothing would work; systemd quietly overrides gpsd's configfile and required additional systemd incantations to change what should have been easy. And the man pages are a mess

And journalctl makes me want to pull my hair out; just let me grep a regular file - discovering namespaces is a nightmare

shalgtoday at 4:25 PM

It’s at odds with the philosophy of do one thing and do it well. Its monolithic feature set pushes out smaller contributors and leads to increased reliance on a singular package. This tends to self reinforce. I also use systemd in my current distro so not sure where I stand on this but it’s a fair concern.

show 1 reply
root-parenttoday at 4:53 PM

Before systemd I had Redhat machines with 3 to 4 years of uptime, and now you need to restart Linux after updates....while Windows people rarely and they laugh at you...

show 1 reply
miloshadzictoday at 4:19 PM

New thing bad

show 1 reply