logoalt Hacker News

skippyfishtoday at 2:07 PM4 repliesview on HN

Can you share your experiment, so that we can draw our own conclusions? I've been paying for Pangram for a long time and have not seen it misbehave even once. I've seen many people attack it, but when I looked more closely, their claims often evidently boiled down to "I want plausible deniability for my own use of LLMs" - i.e., they were clearly posting AI-generated content on social media and just didn't like the possibility of being called out.

I'm not saying that's you, but since a proof is easy to produce, it would be nice if you could share.


Replies

amrit3128today at 2:14 PM

I think most native English speakers are doing well. The one who will face issues are non native ones. I knew English as my third language since about 10 years but I've only truly become somewhat proficient in it in the past 5 or so years, thus it was heavily influenced by LLMs. So who's at fault for this? Me, for speaking like an LLM simply due to my circumstances? Am I now supposed to learn "human" english?

show 2 replies
ano-thertoday at 2:45 PM

I‘ve seen reports of markdown-tags (##) flipping a pangram result from human to machine (with human written text).

But I don’t have a license to confirm.

coldteatoday at 3:55 PM

>I've been paying for Pangram for a long time and have not seen it misbehave even once.

How would you know if you just take whatever slop verdict is serves as correct?

phoghedtoday at 2:14 PM

Read the OP you goofball, there’s examples right there in it.

show 2 replies