logoalt Hacker News

PaulRobinsonyesterday at 3:45 PM2 repliesview on HN

Devil's advocate argument: if they were giving you something in return, and that could be cash, but it might also be "you can have this content for free".

In the UK a few news sites have changed cookie banners to "you can accept and see this stuff for free, or you can sign up for a subscription, which would you prefer?". It's the only time I hit accept (and then clear browser history).

If blanket preferences from browser signals became the norm, a segment might open up where you would configure preferences and a data broker would make sure you get something in return for your data. At minimum it might force paywalled publishers to consider that as a "lite" subscription option.


Replies

inigyouyesterday at 4:46 PM

That's been ruled illegal in the EU, but EU sites still do it. Basically, the consent exception only applies if the user isn't coerced into it. Because coerced consent isn't consent.

troupoyesterday at 3:53 PM

> but it might also be "you can have this content for free".

ads don't require invasve and pervasive tracking

show 2 replies