alt Hacker NewsYeah the clock turned out to be silly, but if you interpret it as risk level instead of time, it makes sense. Since the 70s we have been at a near-100% chance this would happen.
Yeah the clock turned out to be silly, but if you interpret it as risk level instead of time, it makes sense. Since the 70s we have been at a near-100% chance this would happen.
so the probability approaches 0% every 10 years and then goes back up to 99% the following year and repeats 5 times ?
that makes little sense to me