alt Hacker NewsThat just shows how wrong he's been because there was nothing unsafe about AI in 2016. And the people theorizing about this stuff in the 20th century? I want to see what crazy code they were writing
That just shows how wrong he's been because there was nothing unsafe about AI in 2016. And the people theorizing about this stuff in the 20th century? I want to see what crazy code they were writing
Is it not better to anticipate problems for a technology so that we can develop theories and techniques to solve them ahead of time?
For instance, Amodei co-authored RLHF in 2017 [1], 5 years before it went on to be used to turn GPT-3 into ChatGPT.
[1]: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/d...