alt Hacker News> Buttons regularly perform navigations. Clicking a logout button navigates the current page to a logged-out one; clicking a “search” button navigates the current page to the query results.
This seems to conflate appearance with semantics. If an element causes a navigation, I make it a link. Whether it looks like a button is irrelevant, that’s CSS.
I always choose one or the other by intended behavior first, and that always works out great.
That said, I like the idea.
Replies
physicalecon • today at 1:28 AM
[dead]
paulddraper • today at 1:28 AM
Well, the idea here is “things that look like buttons do page navigation.”
And the proposal is that we should more closely align the presentation and function.
You are correct that if you don’t care about alignment, there is nothing wrong with the status quo.
➕ show 1 reply
> This seems to conflate appearance with semantics. If an element causes a navigation, I make it a link.
Neither of my examples work with links. Logout buttons must be buttons because they trigger unsafe requests, and "search" buttons are buttons because they submit the form as a query parameter. Both of these examples, are, however, navigations.[0]
> Whether it looks like a button is irrelevant, that’s CSS.
It's not irrelevant, because even if you style a link like a button (or vice versa), it will still behave like the thing it actually is. That's why it's important to have native HTML behavior that lets people use the right semantic element.
[0] https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/browsing-the-web.html...