May I ask why? If by "not the same" you meant: AI is not at the level of a good human educator, it is a fair argument - but not many humans can afford to have a one-to-one human educator either.

Perhaps I am a bit more optimistic, but if AI could give me, let's say, 90% of an average lecturer's capability, at 10% of the price or even less, that is probably extremely valuable. (For one, I would certainly be interested in learning new things that otherwise wouldn't make sense financially)

I also wish we had an infinite supply of expert teachers available to work 1 on 1 with students at any time day or night for a nominal fee.

Sadly we do not, so something like this will have to serve as a more accessible backup.

Well, hold that thought, what if one-to-one means AI to AI...