> I do not go around posting "omg Rust is SO MUCH BETTER than zig or fil-c, which are TRASH."
> While I still don't plan to write software in it, given that I believe memory safety is table stakes
What exactly am I missing? You know you don't have to hijack Zig threads (repeatedly) with your thoughts on memory safety, right?
> What exactly am I missing?
My point in bringing this up is to strengthen my compliment. Even though I disagree with aspects of Zig's design, the stuff talked about in this post is excellent.