logoalt Hacker News

Kimi K3-256k

228 pointsby monneyboitoday at 7:25 PM59 commentsview on HN

Comments

illithid0today at 8:06 PM

This was posted 38 minutes ago, and as of 20 minutes ago, several Anthropic services are now designated as having a "major outage".

Doubt these are related, but it made me laugh a little.

show 1 reply
doolstoday at 9:10 PM

Hopefully this helps reduce some of the pressure on their infrastructure. Their models have all become super dumb recently and their support are not addressing it. I have a hunch they’ve been serving a significant percentage of requests with quantised models.

MangoCoffeetoday at 9:11 PM

LLMs is quickly became commodities. US AI labs like OpenAI is losing their moat. Hyperscalers and data center owners who can sell cheap token will win

show 1 reply
xyzsparetimexyztoday at 9:05 PM

Wow. So kimi is suddenly half the price for all users until they hit 256k of context? Thats massive.

show 2 replies
try-workingtoday at 9:16 PM

i've never had any issues with 256k context. see no reason to bump up to 1m if it comes at a premium.

madihaatoday at 7:37 PM

That's actually nice! I usually try to stay below 200k context anyway.

show 3 replies
wren6991today at 8:48 PM

This seems functionally similar to OpenAI having a step in pricing once you exceed a certain context length (also at 272k aka 2^18 aka 256k).

Having a lot of active context increases the per-token cost (flops issued and bytes read per token out) so it makes sense to pass that cost on to users. I'm actually surprised it's implemented as a hard cutoff instead of a smooth gradient.

show 1 reply
wxwtoday at 7:52 PM

> k3-256k is now available. Within 256k context, it delivers the same results. k3 (1M) consumes about twice as much quota as k3-256k.

hawtadstoday at 7:45 PM

This is just an API level change right? The model itself should be the same I think.

dgritskotoday at 7:52 PM

This isn't quantized, right? Just a smaller context?

show 1 reply
jscott817today at 9:10 PM

Can we assume that model performance at 90% of the 256k limit != 90% of 1M token limit?

Is this the exact same model just with less VRAM allocated for context window?

lukantoday at 8:06 PM

Since Claude is the first time for me really, really out (TIL against my wished about https://status.claude.com/), I am now interested enough to see what else works. But ... when I click pricing, I see "Join a waitlist". Wtf? Are they really that good, so were totally surprised and overwhelmed by the requests, is this a marketing stunt, or do they just don't have the hardware being in china?

show 4 replies
jedisct1today at 9:01 PM

This is a fantastic option for swival.dev given its very efficient context management compared to e.g. Claude Code.

hendersoontoday at 8:29 PM

What is the purpose of this? Just a hard cutoff below the actual context window? You could set that in your harness anyway.

show 3 replies
sergiotapiatoday at 8:20 PM

I can't seem to find pricing for this model. Since the context size is just a quarter of the full size K3, is the price also much cheaper?

I usually keep my context in chats below 256k anyways so this would be tremendous honestly.

show 1 reply
holoduketoday at 8:35 PM

A bit of topic. But how likely is it that the US will restrict Chinese open weight models and also force Euro countries to do the same? I think it will be effective within 6 months. The US is having a hard time staying competitive.

show 3 replies
ibuildproductstoday at 7:56 PM

omg! new model!!

show 1 reply
superloikatoday at 7:39 PM

[flagged]

periodjettoday at 8:41 PM

Why are Anthropic and OpenAI even allowing their coding harness apps to be plugged into different model providers…? I’m surprised they haven’t figured out a way to clamp down on that by now.

show 3 replies