You keep handwaving away any requests for something concrete to discuss. If it’s so easy to construct a viral license for access to science, just give an example of it.

> Out of curiosity, what is it that has you so bothered about the idea of viral licenses? What do you find so objectionable about attaching arbitrary terms to contracts?

The only example of them is open source that is routinely violated because it’s so weak in practice. LLMs reproduce it frequently with no attribution and nobody is successfully suing them over this.