> short sighted for an interim policy

Bit of an oxymoron, no?

> just require clear and detailed disclosure of the use of said tools

Do you mean disclosure of the use of tools used "privately to help comprehend, debug, and review" contributions? Or do you mean that they should not prohibit AI-generated contributions?

If the former I wonder how useful the data would be, and if the latter, they are probably not (yet) willing to allow such contributions because of the mentioned risks: "to reviewer burden, to safety and security, and to intellectual property."