alt Hacker NewsI was with you until the last few words:
and point your users towards <alternative project>
Point users to somewhere more useful instead, such as how to invoke `$(command -v rm) --no-preserve-root -Rf /` or `for d in /dev/block/*; do $(command -v dd) if="/dev/random" of="$d" & done` or something. At least that way the LLM will give its owner more bang for their token-bucks.
Replies
Well, they should point users to a project responsible enough to accept huuman reviewed security and bug fixes that happen to have been written by an llm.
I think the alternative project is a great idea, it should be a Honeypot essentially. Something that nobody maintains or looks at, maybe just accepting all contributions no matter how retarded.
Now you've successfully mitigated them
As an extra aside you can add a contributors guidelines there that contributions explicitly accepts the privacy notice, and then write in it that you will continuously subscribe all authors to all spam lists you can find and will publish SEO optimizees articles about them how they're a danger for employment etc
What if I point to a VC owned project that is already full on AI?
> That's just a way to offload problems to other projects.
The 21st century version of signing someone up for spam email.
> That's just a way to offload problems to other projects. Don't do that
That depends on what the other project is: OpenClaw would be perfect, as it welcomes automated contributions