alt Hacker NewsYou define OPs post as "objectively correct information" even though it is an unknown future event for which they provided zero evidence?
You define OPs post as "objectively correct information" even though it is an unknown future event for which they provided zero evidence?
There's nothing wrong about that. Historically I have experienced this behaviour on hackernews multiple times, hence my comment.
Since when have hackernews started to become toxic like stackoverflow used to be?