logoalt Hacker News

artisinaltoday at 5:16 PM5 repliesview on HN

This is why we should ditch Celsius for Kelvin. I never liked how we coupled 0 and 100 to where water freezes and boils under certain conditions. Kelvin doesn't rely on non-invariant reference points.


Replies

Guvantetoday at 6:03 PM

You want numbers to be understandable and K produces illogical numbers.

(There is a reason it is common to drop the century when talking about years, humans are less skilled at numbers over 100)

And I know temperatures in Fahrenheit go higher but it is common to refer to Phoenix as "over 100" even when it's high can peak over 120.

show 2 replies
warmdarkseatoday at 6:11 PM

this is actually why i like fahrenheit the most... 0F is "really cold" and 100F is "really hot", whereas in celsius 0C is "kind of cold" and 100C is "uninhabitable". it makes sense for the 0-100 range to be reserved for temperatures frequently encountered in our habitat as humans i think...

show 9 replies
analog31today at 5:53 PM

I think that both the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales are now defined in terms of Kelvin and a formula. Most if not all of the units of measure are no longer related to their history except for an agreement to make the new units match the old ones at some point.

show 1 reply
throwatdem12311today at 6:22 PM

Now do metric vs imperial.

show 2 replies
xgulfietoday at 5:55 PM

Kelvin does still rely on each degree being 1% of the way between freezing and boiling so it kinda does rely on a variant reference point

show 1 reply