Oh nothing serious
just traffic accident https://cdn.xcancel.com/video/9829FB6B34807/https%3A%2F%2Fvi...
refugees on the streets https://cdn.xcancel.com/video/7631603BD54FB/https%3A%2F%2Fvi...
a bomb crater near a hospital in Gaza https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOgBJEcWQAA--zV?format=jpg&name=...
a nuclear power plant in Iran https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOgBP-OXAAATHWQ?format=jpg&name=...
a plane hitting the One World Trade Center https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOoW-0HWIAAdl0y?format=jpg&name=...
the Eiffel tower collapsed https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOoW-z0XkAAN0KI?format=jpg&name=...
an army base in the Amazons https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HOgmohwWEAEn3gq?format=jpg&name=...
Such a brain-dead idea...
I love how terrible these are, the nuclear power plant especially. They've all got an extremely amateur MS Paint vibe to them.
Did Google Earth actually show these as replacements for the true imagery? Or are people simply complaining that people were able to generate these images at all? I'm struggling to understand the controversy.
With the ruckus, I thought this would be something that was displayed in Google Earth.
I can't grasp how this is an issue at all? There are other 20 services you can use to do this exact same thing.