logoalt Hacker News

steveBK123today at 2:00 PM2 repliesview on HN

Yes, they are at best misleading and often just present dangerously incomplete or misdirecting information. The more you know about a topic the more appalling the summary.

I check variations of this search every month and it still fails at a reasonably high rate https://imgur.com/a/tKSQuA3


Replies

d4v3today at 2:07 PM

Can you elaborate? Are they not toxic? Are they toxic, but the chemical analysis wrong?

show 1 reply
fragmedetoday at 2:21 PM

That's interesting. "mums good for cats" and a "mums bad for cats" gives the expected response, it's just "okay" being parsed funny. I've reported it to someone at Google so it'll get fixed... eventually.

show 2 replies