alt Hacker NewsI'm arguing against the actual point you made. You made the pedantic argument about "bootlegs" to distract from my argument. Now you've also decided to insult me.
To what end? Do you think that kind of approach convinces anyone?
There is no "fake android," either. Your whole argument is based on two false premises.
I din't make an argument about "bootleg", I just used the term and you argued it.
Besides, depending on the actual OSI license, you can definitely have bootlegs if you really care to argue.
A bootleg does not need to be exploited commercially. It can just be counterfeit.
I am not insulting you. I am telling you that you are being overly pedantic while being wrong at the same time. You might find this difficult to accept but I'm just calling it.