logoalt Hacker News

bryanlarsentoday at 4:44 PM4 repliesview on HN

pumped storage is still significantly cheaper for seasonal storage. The cut off is about 2 weeks now -- if you need to pull from storage more than twice a month batteries are cheaper. If you need to pull from storage less than twice a month pumped storage is cheaper.


Replies

bluGilltoday at 5:20 PM

The problem with pumped storage is most of the places we can use it are already taken and have been for years.

> pumped storage is still significantly cheaper for seasonal storage

Only because most of the costs have been financially depreciated long ago. Try to build a brand new dam nearly anyplace and the costs will be much higher.

show 1 reply
bryanlarsentoday at 4:56 PM

In most practical cases, the cheapest way to provide carbon-neutral seasonal storage is to use the existing natural gas generators and feed them with carbon neutral synthetic gas. That synthetic gas is super expensive, but when you're only running it a couple times a year the gas is a tiny percentage of the cost.

Rover222today at 6:46 PM

I meant it's cheaper when considering building an entirely new pumped storage facility, vs battery storage.

show 1 reply
s1artibartfasttoday at 5:01 PM

can you explain the economics of that to me, because it doesn't track my understanding.

Are you just talking about total capacity dominated breakeven? The economics of both want daily cycles. Water has a more favorable power/$ scaling curve for storage if you have a site.

show 1 reply