logoalt Hacker News

bad_haircut72today at 11:59 AM1 replyview on HN

Im no military planner so Im not gonna get invested in this debate haha - and obviously a human death is a huge loss - but presumably you could drop a lot of bombs for each lost fighter, so the bang/buck (literally) would be better than with missiles.


Replies

bluegattytoday at 12:07 PM

Planes aircrew high fixed/operating cost - lower unit costs on strikes.

Missiles, more expensive - depending on.

Missiles are not 'rocket science' - pun intended. They're expensive because of the overhead of military industrial complex.

Russia is making ballistic missiles 'China style' - super fast, super cheap. Basically - much bigger than ATACMs, longer range, a bit less precise but vicious. Similar to Iran.