Yes, it turns out that matrix math over a feature space of math works pretty well because unlike poetry or real world work, maths are internally coherent and entirely theoretical.
This not understanding "understanding".
> maths are internally coherent and entirely theoretical
Nope. This kind of wish-washy thinking is not what we mean by understanding.
Funny how you said "it turns out" when the whole point is that we don't understand LLMs - we just empirically see what they are good at.
Claiming that you understand LLMs is similar to saying that you understand how our biology work because you understand evolution. No - you understand the mechanism behind evolution, but not the complexity it produces.