It's also just patently false. Taste is not all that is left. Are software engineers really so full of hubris that they thought coding is all that there is to making a product?
What is left? The second-best architecture for any given technical problem is, in the majority of cases, still good enough.
> Are software engineers really so full of hubris that they thought coding is all that there is to making a product?
Frankly, this barely scratches the surface of the hubris of engineers. I personally think AI has been one of the best things to happen to software engineering. Writing boilerplate or my millionth auth implementation was never why I fell in love with the craft in the first place.