logoalt Hacker News

quentindanjouyesterday at 7:49 PM7 repliesview on HN

The "Astrology" reason emphasized in the article isn't the main reason, they actually quickly talk about it:

> the App Review Board and the Review Board responded that they determined the original rejection was valid because, I shit you not, “We understand that the app includes a live tarot reading feature.”

So that's it, they need to remove the live tarot reading. Which to me while not being astrology, isn't much better.


Replies

burnteyesterday at 11:46 PM

> So that's it, they need to remove the live tarot reading. Which to me while not being astrology, isn't much better.

Further down he states there was never any tarot reading function. So how can he remove a function the app never had and thus a function the reviewer never could have seen?

settsuyesterday at 8:34 PM

Sounds like you'd make a fantastic iOS App Store submission reviewer!

postalcoderyesterday at 7:52 PM

There is no live tarot feature. Thats the point.

john_strinlaiyesterday at 7:54 PM

i put tarot + astrology in the same bucket (and, it appears after some quick searches, so do astrologers and tarot-readers or however you call them)

>So that's it, they need to remove the live tarot reading.

dark hours doesnt have live tarot reading.

Jtariiyesterday at 8:32 PM

It is impressive that you seemingly read the article and still don't know what it was about.

rcstankyesterday at 7:59 PM

You missed the fact that the article also explained there is no feature like that in the app.

show 1 reply
robertjpayneyesterday at 7:51 PM

Did you read the article the app contains no such thing anywhere it’s an astronomy app not astrology and is deeply rooted in real science