Wasn't it always seen as a "winner takes all" business?
If there was one winner then that would make a lot of people very angry.
> Wasn't it always seen as a "winner takes all" business?
No. It was always a pyramid scheme marketed as a "winner takes all" business. But there's no winning. The only winners are those who cash out before it collapses. This is literally Web3 2.0.
There is no "all", that's the point. There is no pot of gold at the end of the AI rainbow.