logoalt Hacker News

Banksy works cost public almost £150k

19 pointsby alvistoday at 4:33 PM37 commentsview on HN

Comments

ryandraketoday at 5:22 PM

The article's photo of the art barricaded from public view with two security people standing guard in front of it speaks even louder than the original artwork.

And then, further down in the article, the picture of a whole structure built to block the view of the piece, with a locked door. Satire writing itself!

show 1 reply
bonoboTPtoday at 5:59 PM

Why does it take 85k to remove it from the wall? I'm pretty sure it doesn't cost that much. There is some ridiculous government inefficiency or embezzling happening or some kind of learned helplessness or malicious compliance. Just go, wash it off and done.

show 2 replies
doikortoday at 5:32 PM

It’s street art/graffiti. If someone wants to tag over it let them. Protecting this stuff with tax payer money is just stupid.

show 1 reply
nzoschketoday at 5:28 PM

Technically this is vandalism of a govt building.

If they're so concerned about cost, why not do what you'd do with any other vandal with a spray paint can...

Immediately paint over it with grey paint to neutralize the "blight", then efficiently do a deeper clean / removal / repair the facade.

Seems like they gave the Banksy very special treatment of fence, guards, etc. and now are paying for the side effects of that.

al_borlandtoday at 4:39 PM

They could do nothing and just let the art exist for free.

show 3 replies
xbartoday at 5:38 PM

The Banksy cost-benefit and clean-protect loops are part of my favorite modern civic dialogs. I like it when the BBC takes the obvious side of the establishment because it is honest.

dgellowtoday at 6:07 PM

> The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) says it has spent £50,000 trying to remove paint from the wall of the Grade II-listed building in Carey Street.

How in the world do you spend £50k to remove a graffiti?

show 2 replies
ForOldHacktoday at 5:55 PM

It costs only 150k? Pay the man. Its public art. Its art, and a damn sight better than the advertisements, wait... are you comparing art to ads? Get the ads to pay for the art? This article is merely government propiganda. Oh Charles... wake up! Knight Banksy noe..

omosubitoday at 5:16 PM

why don't they just sell the works to recoup the costs?

how much does graffiti cost the public in general?

show 1 reply
IshKebabtoday at 5:57 PM

Well, prosecute him for vandalism then to recoup the costs?

m0llusktoday at 4:55 PM

And the value of nothing.

_8L34Ktoday at 5:35 PM

"Think of the money!" This mentality needs to go extinct. Along with billionaires.

show 1 reply
toomuchtodotoday at 4:53 PM

A rounding error to support the arts.

xnxtoday at 5:30 PM

Now do how much tourist money his works have brought in.

allearstoday at 4:48 PM

And well worth it. Too bad they defaced it.

puzzleincomplettoday at 4:58 PM

[dead]

jccalhountoday at 5:10 PM

Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy said: ""Our courts are a national symbol of justice and the rule of law."

It seems like someone doesn't get the symbolism of the Banksy piece.

show 2 replies
FatalLogictoday at 5:09 PM

Original art by Banksy is reportedly valued at millions of £ or $ [0]

The BBC says "Banksy works cost public almost £150k" because "The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) says it has spent £50,000 trying to remove paint from the wall of the Grade II-listed building in Carey Street."

Therefore, the title is incorrect. The cost to the public is much more than £150k. The Ministry's damage to this freely-contributed artwork has probably already cost the public a few million £, not just £150k

[0] https://www.dawsonsauctions.co.uk/news-item/how-much-is-an-o...

show 3 replies