logoalt Hacker News

benj111today at 4:54 PM1 replyview on HN

Half this cost is related to security to actively stop people looking at the art work. If it's not acceptable for banksy to cost tax payers £50k to remove the graffiti, why is acceptable for the powers that be to waste another £50k on security to stop anyone seeing it?

And if that ruins the character of the building, why is the fence acceptable?


Replies

nprateemtoday at 5:07 PM

Probably to stop people rocking up and cutting them out of the buildings

show 1 reply