logoalt Hacker News

dummydummy1234today at 1:37 PM6 repliesview on HN

So anyone have prior art we can point to? Because no way is a rpc call novel.


Replies

CodesInChaostoday at 2:12 PM

Unfortunately there are many patents that simply combine an old thing with a new thing in the obvious way. Since the new thing is new, the combination is "novel".

show 1 reply
sandeepkdtoday at 2:44 PM

You pay the lawyer in thousands to use a language which meets the criteria for the patent. Thousands of software patents are repetition of each other with some thing in particular worded differently

abecedariustoday at 1:42 PM

I didn't carefully read either of these, but it reminds me of https://blog.cloudflare.com/code-mode-mcp/ (note it predates the filing).

c7btoday at 1:42 PM

Seems that this is a patent application from March, so a challenge should still be possible. But it would have to come from a named entity afaik (not a lawyer).

jazzyjacksontoday at 2:08 PM

Improvements in existing tech can be patented. An RPC call that an AI writes for itself and then executes is a novelty from prior art. Whether it’s non-obvious is up for debate but if it gets past the patent officer that debate happens via lawsuit

show 2 replies