logoalt Hacker News

tomrodyesterday at 8:50 PM4 repliesview on HN

I'm surprised we're not seeing heaps of lawsuits here. Age verification in general violates privacy.


Replies

Reason077yesterday at 9:30 PM

Nothing in this bill requires age verification. It just requires the OS to have a way to specify the user’s age (not necessarily an exact birth date), so that it can be provided to apps and websites that ask for it.

NavinFyesterday at 8:54 PM

lawsuits for what? AFAIK you have no right to privacy in this sense

show 2 replies
kelseyfrogyesterday at 8:54 PM

> I'm surprised we're not seeing heaps of lawsuits here.

Why do you think that is?

cogman10yesterday at 8:54 PM

You don't have a right to privacy. It should be covered under the 9th amendment, but the supreme court generally just ignores that amendment.

Edit: I see people don't like this comment, so here's an article about it from Wex law [1] (read under "Roe's Overturning"). The part of the Dobbs decision was removing a right to privacy and promising that it could be revisited in overturning other cases like Griswald.

The 9th amendment has never been used to establish a right to privacy, but then I don't think the 9th has ever been used to establish any right. We've used the 14th in the past to establish that right and now it seems that's no longer good law.

> While it is unclear to what extent that may have on the right to privacy in the current time; it is likely that the case law around this right will continue to evolve with more recent Supreme Court decisions.

[1] https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/right_to_privacy

show 1 reply