logoalt Hacker News

mbrumlowtoday at 5:38 PM9 repliesview on HN

Rust is better. It just is. Go is not bad. But as a long time go advocate, the hurdle for my teams using rust is gone, and thus everything is now rust.


Replies

simonwtoday at 5:41 PM

Personally I find Rust a lot harder to read than Go.

If you're going to have an agent write most of your code readability is very important.

show 6 replies
odo1242today at 6:03 PM

Personally, Rust or Typescript both happen to be better than Go for me. TypeScript has better type-safety and tooling for user-facing apps, and Rust has better type-safety and tooling for algorithmic stuff or stuff that needs to run fast.

rsyringtoday at 5:40 PM

I guess the difference in compile times doesn't matter enough?

ramoztoday at 5:43 PM

idk. In my experience the build/compile experience has been far worse esp for fast iterating. Even concurrency models did not seem as intuitive as Go's. Im no systems expert - have deployed practical and performant distributed systems though.

jhawk28today at 5:42 PM

Zig seems to have more closely aligned with what Go devs prefer.

show 1 reply
amazingamazingtoday at 5:43 PM

Ignoring performance for the moment (because most situations are bottlenecked on something else), why is rust better?

threethirtytwotoday at 5:41 PM

I agree, but this doesn't justify anything. Saying rust is better because it "just is" won't convince anyone. I'd like to know why you think it's better.

nchmytoday at 5:40 PM

can you elaborate?

show 1 reply
iberatortoday at 5:43 PM

except Rust is HARD while GO is super easy.

show 3 replies