logoalt Hacker News

tptacekyesterday at 8:37 PM2 repliesview on HN

The distinction is that Mastodon doesn't have to grow, and Bluesky does. There's an extent to which Bluesky is viable because its venture-funded owner pays for the infrastructure it operates on (Mastodon communities generally have to stand on their own two feet). If there's no path for Bluesky to grow into a viable business on its current financial runway, the funding for the infrastructure will end.


Replies

Karrot_Kreamyesterday at 9:32 PM

ATProto infrastructure is mostly open and there are folks operating pieces of it independently even if the landscape is dominated by the Bluesky PBC. It's true that Mastodon grew bottom-up without centralized funding so the shuttering of the PBC will be a big deal for the AT ecosystem but it's all independently doable.

show 1 reply
singpolyma3yesterday at 9:07 PM

We already have others running infrastructure as well so if bsky goes away the platform can survive