logoalt Hacker News

krigetoday at 10:19 AM5 repliesview on HN

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methane_emissions

fossil fuels contribute 33% farm animals contribute 30%

Not astronomically; marginally. Anyone who's been around herbivore farm animals will tell you they fart. A lot.

Then again, farm plants are a further 18%.


Replies

modo_mariotoday at 10:33 AM

Those fossil fuels emit what otherwise wouldn't be available in the carbon cycle.

A cow that's fed on gras and farts emits nothing that that gras didn't pick up and contributes virtually nothing to climate change in the long term.

show 1 reply
enquirewithintoday at 10:57 AM

I didn’t say animal agriculture, I said “cow farts”. The animal agriculture figure listed on that Wikipedia page includes all ruminant livestock (mainly cattle, sheep, and goats).

Also, from that Wikipedia article:

There is accumulating research and data showing that oil and gas industry methane emissions – or from fossil fuel extraction, distribution and use – are much larger than thought.[35][36][37][38][39]

Still, my “astronomically dwarfs” looks to be overstating it by a wide margin.

Llamamoetoday at 10:29 AM

> Then again, farm plants are a further 18%.

Yeah, but they also provide 80% of the world's calories to animals' 20%

tempfiletoday at 10:23 AM

> farm plants are a further 18%

Apparently mainly rice growing. I knew paddy fields were bad, but I didn't know they were that bad. Per calorie I am sure it is more like a tenth that of ruminants, perhaps less, but still worth replacing with other carbohydrates.

show 2 replies
dev_l1x_betoday at 10:29 AM

With corn based feeding.