I can see how the post comes across that way. I may need to edit it to somehow be clearer about how I approached the workload development. I'll refer you to my other replies to comments for more information on my approach:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49278424 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49278521
Also appreciate the nice words at the end :) I'm feeling a bit ganged up on.
I’m sorry you’re feeling ganged up on, I thought it was a nice article and cool you were able to repro the bug with your tools.
Like some others have mentioned, one of my earliest thoughts was “how much of a hint was the LLM given about the bug?” I think if the prompt used was stated clearly/verbatim near the beginning of the article, that would probably dispel a good amount of the criticism.